In the ever-evolving advertising landscape, societal norms are crucial to the acceptability of marketing campaigns. What was once deemed clever or attention-grabbing may now be considered insensitive or culturally ignorant. Here are 13 iconic ad campaigns that, if launched today, would face intense scrutiny and likely be shunned for their insensitivity.

This post may contain affiliate links meaning I get commissions for purchases made in this post. Read my disclosure policy here.

Noxzema’s “Take it off. Take it all off” Campaign

In the 1980s, Noxzema’s advertising campaign urged people to “take it off” and cleanse their faces with their product, suggesting that true beauty could only be attained without makeup. Such messaging is now considered problematic as it promotes unattainable beauty standards and imposes unnecessary pressure, particularly on women, to conform to limited definitions of attractiveness.

Aunt Jemima Pancake Mix (Late 19th Century – Early 20th Century)

The Aunt Jemima Pancake Mix brand, established in the late 19th century, featured a stereotypical depiction of a “mammy” figure, perpetuating racial stereotypes for generations. Despite its widespread popularity, the imagery associated with Aunt Jemima is now rightly condemned as racially insensitive and culturally inappropriate.

Land O’Lakes’ “Indian Maiden” Logo (1928 – 2020)

For nearly a century, Land O’Lakes’s packaging featured a logo featuring an Indigenous woman, commonly referred to as the “Indian Maiden.” While initially seen as a symbol of heritage and authenticity, the logo eventually faced criticism for its cultural appropriation and perpetuation of stereotypes.

Camel Cigarettes: “I’d Walk a Mile for a Camel” (20th Century)

During an era when smoking was socially acceptable and even glamorized, Camel Cigarettes’ iconic slogan, “I’d Walk a Mile for a Camel,” epitomized the brand’s marketing strategy. The campaign appealed to notions of masculinity, independence, and adventure, positioning smoking as a symbol of rugged individualism.

Carl’s Jr. “Spicy Paris” Ad (2005)

Carl’s Jr. is known for its suggestive advertising campaigns, but none sparked as much controversy as the “Spicy Paris’ commercial featuring socialite Paris Hilton. The ad, which depicted Hilton sensually washing a car while eating a burger, was criticized for its overt sexualization of women and reinforcement of harmful stereotypes.

Dolce & Gabbana’s “Racist” Chinese Ad (2018)

Dolce & Gabbana faced international backlash for an online ad campaign featuring a Chinese model attempting to eat Italian food with chopsticks. The ad was widely criticized for its cultural insensitivity and perpetuation of racial stereotypes.

Pepsi’s Kendall Jenner Ad (2017)

Pepsi’s ill-conceived commercial, featuring model Kendall Jenner bridging divides between protesters and police officers with a can of Pepsi, sparked immediate backlash for trivializing social justice movements. Critics accused Pepsi of exploiting serious issues such as police brutality and racial inequality for commercial gain.

Skittles’ “Umbilical” Ad (2019)

Skittles’ Super Bowl commercial featuring a man with an umbilical cord attached to his mother raised eyebrows and sparked controversy for its bizarre and unsettling imagery. Critics argued that the ad crossed the line of good taste and trivialized the miracle of childbirth by reducing it to a comedic spectacle.

H&M’s “Coolest Monkey in the Jungle” Hoodie (2018)

H&M faced widespread condemnation for featuring a young black boy sporting a hoodie that featured the phrase “Coolest Monkey in the Jungle” on its website. The racially insensitive ad sparked outrage and accusations of cultural insensitivity, particularly given the historical context of comparing Black people to primates as a form of dehumanization.

Burger King’s “Whopper Sacrifice” Facebook App (2009)

Photo Credit: Shutterstock.

Burger King’s controversial marketing stunt, which incentivized Facebook users to unfriend people in exchange for a free Whopper, sparked debate over the ethics of social media manipulation for commercial gain. Critics argued that the campaign promoted callousness and prioritized material rewards over genuine human connections.

Ford’s “Leave Your Worries Behind” Ad (2013)

Ford’s ad depicting three bound and gagged women stuffed in the trunk of a car sparked outrage and accusations of promoting violence against women. The ad’s disturbing imagery and casual depiction of abduction and confinement crossed a line for many viewers, who found it deeply unsettling and offensive.

Calvin Klein’s “Banned” Underwear Ads (1995)

Calvin Klein’s provocative advertising campaigns featuring underage models in suggestive poses stirred controversy and led to the banning of several ads in multiple countries. Critics argued that the ads sexualized minors and promoted unhealthy body image standards, exploiting vulnerable young people for commercial gain. The scandal prompted a public outcry.

Mountain Dew’s “Felicia the Goat” Commercial (2013)

Photo Credit: Shutterstock.

Mountain Dew’s “Felicia the Goat” commercial stirred controversy for its perceived insensitivity and reinforcement of negative stereotypes. Critics pointed out the ad’s potential to perpetuate harmful racial tropes. The incident underscored the importance of cultural sensitivity in advertising and the need to avoid messaging that could offend marginalized communities.