Once upon a time, magazines ruled the world. But they mostly looked at the world from a masculine Western lens. In today’s world, where sensitivity and awareness towards various social issues are on the rise, many publications from past decades contain content considered offensive or inappropriate by today’s standards. Let’s journey through history and explore 11 vintage magazines that would likely face removal from shelves due to their offensive content.

This post may contain affiliate links meaning I get commissions for purchases made in this post. Read my disclosure policy here.

Mademoiselle

Once revered as a pinnacle of women’s fashion and lifestyle, Mademoiselle’s pages were often filled with images and articles promoting unattainable beauty standards and reinforcing traditional gender roles. From its glossy covers to its feature stories, the magazine perpetuated the notion that a woman’s worth lay primarily in her physical appearance and ability to conform to societal expectations.

National Geographic

While renowned for its breathtaking photography and in-depth exploration narratives, National Geographic has faced scrutiny for its historical portrayal of indigenous peoples and non-Western cultures. Often depicted through a colonial lens, these communities were presented as exotic and primitive, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and disregarding their rich cultural heritage.

Playboy

Beyond its provocative centerfolds, Playboy magazine shaped societal attitudes towards sex and relationships. However, its portrayal of women as mere objects of desire and its reinforcement of traditional gender roles have been widely criticized. From its titillating photo spreads to its articles on “how to please your man,” Playboy perpetuated harmful stereotypes and contributed to a culture of objectification and sexism.

Esquire

Esteemed for its literary contributions and cultural commentary, Esquire was a trendsetter in men’s magazines. However, its portrayal of women often fell short of progressive ideals, with articles and advertisements reinforcing traditional gender roles and objectifying the female form. From its fashion coverage to its profiles of successful men, Esquire perpetuated stereotypes that limited the role of women in society and undermined their agency.

Good Housekeeping pre-1960s

Pre-1960s Good Housekeeping would be criticized for reinforcing narrow gender roles. Articles likely focused on how to be a perfect housewife, prioritizing homemaking and appearance over women’s ambitions outside the domestic sphere. Beauty tips might center on attracting a husband, and advice columns might suggest ways to manage a household efficiently, limiting women’s roles and perpetuating the idea that their primary value lies in domesticity. This approach would be seen as outdated and unfair by today’s standards.

Physical Culture magazine (pre-1940s)

This magazine would be criticized today for several reasons. It promoted unrealistic and potentially dangerous physique ideals for men, focusing on extreme muscularity that could be unhealthy. The emphasis on dominance and a narrow definition of masculinity could be seen as exclusionary. Finally, the magazine founder, Eugen Sandow, may have been associated with eugenics beliefs, a discredited theory promoting selective breeding.

Cosmopolitan

As a trailblazer in women’s magazines, Cosmopolitan pushed boundaries and challenged societal norms. However, its content occasionally reinforced stereotypes and promoted unrealistic beauty standards. Whether through its focus on relationships or its beauty tips, Cosmopolitan perpetuated a narrow and often harmful view of femininity.

Life magazine in the 1950s

Life magazine captured the essence of a transformative era by reflecting post-war American values and aspirations, . However, its portrayal of gender roles and family life often reflected the prevailing attitudes of the time. Whether through its advertisements or feature stories, Life perpetuated stereotypes that reinforced traditional gender norms and marginalized minority perspectives.

Ramparts

With bold investigative journalism and a countercultural stance, Ramparts magazine challenged the status quo and pushed boundaries. However, its content occasionally crossed the line into offensive territory, perpetuating stereotypes based on race, gender, and ideology. Whether through its political cartoons or provocative articles, Ramparts sometimes failed to uphold the principles of tolerance and respect.

The Ladies’ Home Journal (pre-1960s)

This magazine would be criticized today for reinforcing narrow gender roles. Articles likely focused on how to be a perfect housewife and win a husband, limiting women’s aspirations. Beauty advice might prioritize attracting a mate over personal expression. This rigid view of womanhood would be seen as outdated and excluding women’s potential outside the domestic sphere.

Stag magazine (1930-70s)

Stag would be heavily criticized today for its exploitative and sexist content. The magazine primarily featured scantily clad women, objectifying them for the male gaze. The humor often relied on crude stereotypes and lacked social awareness. Modern audiences would find it demeaning to women and lacking in artistic merit. The magazine reinforces outdated gender roles and fails to represent women as individuals with agency.